Discussion:
La Prairie, Quebec mayor dies from wasp stings
(too old to reply)
(ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
2014-07-22 02:09:59 UTC
Permalink
Wow - what a lesson for those who are out and enjoying summer - but
without an epinephrine injector - which is a very inexpensive item that
can be purchased over the counter.
____________________________________________

The Globe and Mail - July 21, 2014


La Prairie, Quebec mayor dies from wasp stings



Lucie F. Roussel was near her cottage in the Eastern Townships Sunday
when she stepped on a wasps' nest, and was stung repeatedly

The mayor of a Montreal bedroom community who was enjoying a weekend in
the country has died of anaphylactic shock after wasps attacked her with
repeated stings.

Lucie F. Roussel, the mayor of La Prairie, was near her cottage in the
Eastern Townships Sunday when she stepped on a wasps' nest, and was
stung repeatedly. A friend said she suffered at least 15 stings. Ms.
Roussel, 51, was transported from her cottage near Stratford to hospital
in Thetford Mines, Que., where she was pronounced dead.

Colleagues on city council in the community just west of Montreal and
other friends said they were not aware she suffered from allergies. But
a neighbour in Stratford said she was indeed allergic to venom from bee
and wasp stings but did not have an epinephrine injector with her to
counteract anaphylactic shock.

Deaths from venomous insect stings are very rare in Canada.

Forty people died from bee, wasp or hornet venom in Canada during a
12-year stretch ending in 2011, the most recent period for which
national numbers are available from Statistics Canada.

The annual death toll ranged from a high of seven in 2009 to a low of
one death in each of 2006 and 2011. An average of 3.3 Canadians died
from stings each year.

By comparison, about 10 Canadians die from being struck by lightning
each summer, according to Environment Canada.

La Prairie city manager Jean Bergeron said he was in a "state of shock"
at the sudden death of a mayor he described as conscientious, devoted
and deeply engaged in her community long before she became mayor. "It's
unbelievable," said Councillor Christian Caron before referring further
questions to the city's spokesperson.

Ms. Roussel leaves an 18-year-old daughter, Constance, and a 19-year-old
son, Antonin. Before she entered politics, Ms. Roussel practised law in
partnership with her husband, Yvon Lemay. He died of a heart attack in
December, 2009, at age 47.

"I feel just infinite sadness, so much pain for them," friend Hélène
Ste-Marie told reporters. "She was just so full of life."

Ms. Ste-Marie said the mayor faced the death of her husband with
enormous strength. "I hope her children will have similar strength," she
said.

Montreal Mayor Denis Coderre and Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard were
among those offering their condolences over the death of the mayor, who
was a provincial Liberal candidate in the 2012 election and finished third.

"Their children must now go through another test that will demand great
courage," the Premier said. "I want them to know they can be proud of
their mother's accomplishments."

Compared with Canada, deaths from bee and wasps stings are more common
but still rare in the United States, where longer summers and milder
winters in much of the country extend stinging season.

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 665
people died in the U.S. during the same 12-year period. Most of the
deaths were linked to allergies, according to the CDC.

Unlike bees, wasps can sting repeatedly.

About 2 per cent of the population suffer from allergies to the venom
from bees, wasps and hornets.

Many people aren't aware they are allergic, experts say.
Alan Baker
2014-07-22 03:18:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Wow - what a lesson for those who are out and enjoying summer - but
without an epinephrine injector - which is a very inexpensive item that
can be purchased over the counter.
Wow - you are so ill-informed it's frightening to think that you might
be responsible for anyone's wellbeing.

While they may not be prescription medications, they're not "very
inexpensive". An epenephrine injector costs about $100 and they expire
in less than 2 years.

Is it still a good idea to have one if you can get one? Sure.

But let's start out from accurate information.
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
____________________________________________
The Globe and Mail - July 21, 2014
La Prairie, Quebec mayor dies from wasp stings
Lucie F. Roussel was near her cottage in the Eastern Townships Sunday
when she stepped on a wasps' nest, and was stung repeatedly
The mayor of a Montreal bedroom community who was enjoying a weekend in
the country has died of anaphylactic shock after wasps attacked her
with repeated stings.
Lucie F. Roussel, the mayor of La Prairie, was near her cottage in the
Eastern Townships Sunday when she stepped on a wasps' nest, and was
stung repeatedly. A friend said she suffered at least 15 stings. Ms.
Roussel, 51, was transported from her cottage near Stratford to
hospital in Thetford Mines, Que., where she was pronounced dead.
Colleagues on city council in the community just west of Montreal and
other friends said they were not aware she suffered from allergies. But
a neighbour in Stratford said she was indeed allergic to venom from bee
and wasp stings but did not have an epinephrine injector with her to
counteract anaphylactic shock.
Deaths from venomous insect stings are very rare in Canada.
Forty people died from bee, wasp or hornet venom in Canada during a
12-year stretch ending in 2011, the most recent period for which
national numbers are available from Statistics Canada.
The annual death toll ranged from a high of seven in 2009 to a low of
one death in each of 2006 and 2011. An average of 3.3 Canadians died
from stings each year.
By comparison, about 10 Canadians die from being struck by lightning
each summer, according to Environment Canada.
La Prairie city manager Jean Bergeron said he was in a "state of shock"
at the sudden death of a mayor he described as conscientious, devoted
and deeply engaged in her community long before she became mayor. "It's
unbelievable," said Councillor Christian Caron before referring further
questions to the city's spokesperson.
Ms. Roussel leaves an 18-year-old daughter, Constance, and a
19-year-old son, Antonin. Before she entered politics, Ms. Roussel
practised law in partnership with her husband, Yvon Lemay. He died of a
heart attack in December, 2009, at age 47.
"I feel just infinite sadness, so much pain for them," friend Hélène
Ste-Marie told reporters. "She was just so full of life."
Ms. Ste-Marie said the mayor faced the death of her husband with
enormous strength. "I hope her children will have similar strength,"
she said.
Montreal Mayor Denis Coderre and Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard were
among those offering their condolences over the death of the mayor, who
was a provincial Liberal candidate in the 2012 election and finished third.
"Their children must now go through another test that will demand great
courage," the Premier said. "I want them to know they can be proud of
their mother's accomplishments."
Compared with Canada, deaths from bee and wasps stings are more common
but still rare in the United States, where longer summers and milder
winters in much of the country extend stinging season.
According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 665
people died in the U.S. during the same 12-year period. Most of the
deaths were linked to allergies, according to the CDC.
Unlike bees, wasps can sting repeatedly.
About 2 per cent of the population suffer from allergies to the venom
from bees, wasps and hornets.
Many people aren't aware they are allergic, experts say.
M.I.Wakefield
2014-07-22 03:35:29 UTC
Permalink
Snip!
Post by Alan Baker
But let's start out from accurate information.
Karen will need directions to there.
(ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
2014-07-22 19:30:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Snip!
Post by Alan Baker
But let's start out from accurate information.
Karen will need directions to there.
Who's "Karen"? Your fictitious nemesis? I'll bet you had fictitious
friends when you were a kid.
No one else would play with you.
Alan Baker
2014-07-22 19:33:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Snip!
Post by Alan Baker
But let's start out from accurate information.
Karen will need directions to there.
Who's "Karen"? Your fictitious nemesis? I'll bet you had fictitious
friends when you were a kid.
No one else would play with you.
You are "Karen", Karen.

Happy to straighten that out for you.
Uncle Steve
2014-07-22 19:40:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Snip!
Post by Alan Baker
But let's start out from accurate information.
Karen will need directions to there.
Who's "Karen"? Your fictitious nemesis? I'll bet you had fictitious
friends when you were a kid.
No one else would play with you.
You are "Karen", Karen.
Happy to straighten that out for you.
How? By informing everyone that you're a pathological liar and a
bigot besides?



Regards,

Uncle Steve
--
Let me guess. The voices in _your_ head tell you that you're
special/intelligent/chosen/whatever which makes the quality of _your_
delusions so much better than those reported by your garden-variety
mental patient.
Alan Baker
2014-07-22 19:43:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Snip!
Post by Alan Baker
But let's start out from accurate information.
Karen will need directions to there.
Who's "Karen"? Your fictitious nemesis? I'll bet you had fictitious
friends when you were a kid.
No one else would play with you.
You are "Karen", Karen.
Happy to straighten that out for you.
How? By informing everyone that you're a pathological liar and a
bigot besides?
How does anything I've ever said suggest I'm either of those?
Uncle Steve
2014-07-22 20:03:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Snip!
Post by Alan Baker
But let's start out from accurate information.
Karen will need directions to there.
Who's "Karen"? Your fictitious nemesis? I'll bet you had fictitious
friends when you were a kid.
No one else would play with you.
You are "Karen", Karen.
Happy to straighten that out for you.
How? By informing everyone that you're a pathological liar and a
bigot besides?
How does anything I've ever said suggest I'm either of those?
Why should I explain my reasoning to you when you would never do the
same (unless you were somehow compelled by an authority you could not
otherwise avoid)?


Regards,

Uncle Steve
--
Let me guess. The voices in _your_ head tell you that you're
special/intelligent/chosen/whatever which makes the quality of _your_
delusions so much better than those reported by your garden-variety
mental patient.
Alan Baker
2014-07-22 20:16:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Snip!
Post by Alan Baker
But let's start out from accurate information.
Karen will need directions to there.
Who's "Karen"? Your fictitious nemesis? I'll bet you had fictitious
friends when you were a kid.
No one else would play with you.
You are "Karen", Karen.
Happy to straighten that out for you.
How? By informing everyone that you're a pathological liar and a
bigot besides?
How does anything I've ever said suggest I'm either of those?
Why should I explain my reasoning to you when you would never do the
same (unless you were somehow compelled by an authority you could not
otherwise avoid)?
Ducking?

I understand.

Writing why you won't explain is a lot easier than writing an explanation...

...when you don't really have one.
Uncle Steve
2014-07-22 22:04:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by M.I.Wakefield
On 2014-07-22 02:09:59 +0000, (ಠ_ಠ)Раиса
Snip!
But let's start out from accurate information.
Karen will need directions to there.
Who's "Karen"? Your fictitious nemesis? I'll bet you had fictitious
friends when you were a kid.
No one else would play with you.
You are "Karen", Karen.
Happy to straighten that out for you.
How? By informing everyone that you're a pathological liar and a
bigot besides?
How does anything I've ever said suggest I'm either of those?
Why should I explain my reasoning to you when you would never do the
same (unless you were somehow compelled by an authority you could not
otherwise avoid)?
Ducking?
I understand.
Writing why you won't explain is a lot easier than writing an explanation...
...when you don't really have one.
No, I'm explaining the concept of reciprocity. You imagine I am
obligated to concede to you when all you do is take take take and
provide nothing in return except lies and insults.

What you're about is harassing certain individuals past the point of
tolerance, and no uncivlized amoral dirty trick is too illegal, too
immoral, or to extreme for your tastes. You "win" when you've
provoked something actionable, but of course nothing of your behaviour
or actions will be allowed to be considered when that happens. No
different from a corrupt pig who commits unprovoked violence against a
citizen and who then arrests that citizen if he dares to defend
himself.

Just another uncivlized piece of lying filth in the company of more
uncivilized filth infesting these newsgroups. But oh, no, it's all in
my imagination and you could never be the corrupt, malicious fuck you
are in reality.



Regards,

Uncle Steve
--
Let me guess. The voices in _your_ head tell you that you're
special/intelligent/chosen/whatever which makes the quality of _your_
delusions so much better than those reported by your garden-variety
mental patient.
Chom Noamsky
2014-07-22 22:27:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by M.I.Wakefield
On 2014-07-22 02:09:59 +0000, (�� _�� )� аиса
Snip!
But let's start out from accurate information.
Karen will need directions to there.
Who's "Karen"? Your fictitious nemesis? I'll bet you had fictitious
friends when you were a kid.
No one else would play with you.
You are "Karen", Karen.
Happy to straighten that out for you.
How? By informing everyone that you're a pathological liar and a
bigot besides?
How does anything I've ever said suggest I'm either of those?
Why should I explain my reasoning to you when you would never do the
same (unless you were somehow compelled by an authority you could not
otherwise avoid)?
Ducking?
I understand.
Writing why you won't explain is a lot easier than writing an explanation...
...when you don't really have one.
No, I'm explaining the concept of reciprocity. You imagine I am
obligated to concede to you when all you do is take take take and
provide nothing in return except lies and insults.
What you're about is harassing certain individuals past the point of
tolerance, and no uncivlized amoral dirty trick is too illegal, too
immoral, or to extreme for your tastes. You "win" when you've
provoked something actionable, but of course nothing of your behaviour
or actions will be allowed to be considered when that happens. No
different from a corrupt pig who commits unprovoked violence against a
citizen and who then arrests that citizen if he dares to defend
himself.
Just another uncivlized piece of lying filth in the company of more
uncivilized filth infesting these newsgroups. But oh, no, it's all in
my imagination and you could never be the corrupt, malicious fuck you
are in reality.
Now, would you call that a rant or a rave?

Holy doodle, somebody needs a Prozac.
Uncle Steve
2014-07-22 22:43:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by M.I.Wakefield
On 2014-07-22 02:09:59 +0000, (�� _�� )� аи�?а
Snip!
But let's start out from accurate information.
Karen will need directions to there.
Who's "Karen"? Your fictitious nemesis? I'll bet you had fictitious
friends when you were a kid.
No one else would play with you.
You are "Karen", Karen.
Happy to straighten that out for you.
How? By informing everyone that you're a pathological liar and a
bigot besides?
How does anything I've ever said suggest I'm either of those?
Why should I explain my reasoning to you when you would never do the
same (unless you were somehow compelled by an authority you could not
otherwise avoid)?
Ducking?
I understand.
Writing why you won't explain is a lot easier than writing an explanation...
...when you don't really have one.
No, I'm explaining the concept of reciprocity. You imagine I am
obligated to concede to you when all you do is take take take and
provide nothing in return except lies and insults.
What you're about is harassing certain individuals past the point of
tolerance, and no uncivlized amoral dirty trick is too illegal, too
immoral, or to extreme for your tastes. You "win" when you've
provoked something actionable, but of course nothing of your behaviour
or actions will be allowed to be considered when that happens. No
different from a corrupt pig who commits unprovoked violence against a
citizen and who then arrests that citizen if he dares to defend
himself.
Just another uncivlized piece of lying filth in the company of more
uncivilized filth infesting these newsgroups. But oh, no, it's all in
my imagination and you could never be the corrupt, malicious fuck you
are in reality.
Now, would you call that a rant or a rave?
Holy doodle, somebody needs a Prozac.
There's your holy narrative. What do you do when events and facts
interfere with your narrative? You lie, distort, and ignore relevant
evidence. After all, why should reality or mere facts interfere with
your political "needs"? Especially when it is so lucrative to loot
from civilians and so satisfying to prove your inherent superiority by
proving you are exempt from mortal constraints such as the law.

Laws are for little people; ain't that so Mr. chompchompchomp?



Regards,

Uncle Steve
--
Let me guess. The voices in _your_ head tell you that you're
special/intelligent/chosen/whatever which makes the quality of _your_
delusions so much better than those reported by your garden-variety
mental patient.
Chom Noamsky
2014-07-22 23:26:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by M.I.Wakefield
On 2014-07-22 02:09:59 +0000, (ಠ_ಠ)РаиÑ?а
Snip!
But let's start out from accurate information.
Karen will need directions to there.
Who's "Karen"? Your fictitious nemesis? I'll bet you had fictitious
friends when you were a kid.
No one else would play with you.
You are "Karen", Karen.
Happy to straighten that out for you.
How? By informing everyone that you're a pathological liar and a
bigot besides?
How does anything I've ever said suggest I'm either of those?
Why should I explain my reasoning to you when you would never do the
same (unless you were somehow compelled by an authority you could not
otherwise avoid)?
Ducking?
I understand.
Writing why you won't explain is a lot easier than writing an explanation...
...when you don't really have one.
No, I'm explaining the concept of reciprocity. You imagine I am
obligated to concede to you when all you do is take take take and
provide nothing in return except lies and insults.
What you're about is harassing certain individuals past the point of
tolerance, and no uncivlized amoral dirty trick is too illegal, too
immoral, or to extreme for your tastes. You "win" when you've
provoked something actionable, but of course nothing of your behaviour
or actions will be allowed to be considered when that happens. No
different from a corrupt pig who commits unprovoked violence against a
citizen and who then arrests that citizen if he dares to defend
himself.
Just another uncivlized piece of lying filth in the company of more
uncivilized filth infesting these newsgroups. But oh, no, it's all in
my imagination and you could never be the corrupt, malicious fuck you
are in reality.
Now, would you call that a rant or a rave?
Holy doodle, somebody needs a Prozac.
There's your holy narrative. What do you do when events and facts
interfere with your narrative? You lie, distort, and ignore relevant
evidence. After all, why should reality or mere facts interfere with
your political "needs"? Especially when it is so lucrative to loot
from civilians and so satisfying to prove your inherent superiority by
proving you are exempt from mortal constraints such as the law.
Laws are for little people; ain't that so Mr. chompchompchomp?
Laws aren't always moral and ethical... so you're a legal positivist are ya!
Uncle Steve
2014-07-22 23:53:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by M.I.Wakefield
On 2014-07-22 02:09:59 +0000, (�� _�� )� аи�?а
Snip!
But let's start out from accurate information.
Karen will need directions to there.
Who's "Karen"? Your fictitious nemesis? I'll bet you had fictitious
friends when you were a kid.
No one else would play with you.
You are "Karen", Karen.
Happy to straighten that out for you.
How? By informing everyone that you're a pathological liar and a
bigot besides?
How does anything I've ever said suggest I'm either of those?
Why should I explain my reasoning to you when you would never do the
same (unless you were somehow compelled by an authority you could not
otherwise avoid)?
Ducking?
I understand.
Writing why you won't explain is a lot easier than writing an explanation...
...when you don't really have one.
No, I'm explaining the concept of reciprocity. You imagine I am
obligated to concede to you when all you do is take take take and
provide nothing in return except lies and insults.
What you're about is harassing certain individuals past the point of
tolerance, and no uncivlized amoral dirty trick is too illegal, too
immoral, or to extreme for your tastes. You "win" when you've
provoked something actionable, but of course nothing of your behaviour
or actions will be allowed to be considered when that happens. No
different from a corrupt pig who commits unprovoked violence against a
citizen and who then arrests that citizen if he dares to defend
himself.
Just another uncivlized piece of lying filth in the company of more
uncivilized filth infesting these newsgroups. But oh, no, it's all in
my imagination and you could never be the corrupt, malicious fuck you
are in reality.
Now, would you call that a rant or a rave?
Holy doodle, somebody needs a Prozac.
There's your holy narrative. What do you do when events and facts
interfere with your narrative? You lie, distort, and ignore relevant
evidence. After all, why should reality or mere facts interfere with
your political "needs"? Especially when it is so lucrative to loot
from civilians and so satisfying to prove your inherent superiority by
proving you are exempt from mortal constraints such as the law.
Laws are for little people; ain't that so Mr. chompchompchomp?
Laws aren't always moral and ethical... so you're a legal positivist are ya!
You'll never admit to what I actually hold to be true. It is much
more important for you to impose your "narrative" and the "facts" that
"support" it.

But you can have this one for free: some laws are necessary for
civilization to succeed, particularly where corrupt filth like you are
to be found. You like to pretend that you can be civilized and live
in a civlized society where you and yours are free from the
constraints of civilization. You can't have it both ways, but then if
you loot and destroy the lives of mere mortals in your lawless fashion
it does not affect your enjoyment of the amenities of civilization,
now does it?

You'll never be immortal or all knowing, but if you conscientiously
ignore those two key facts and only abuse and attack those who are
denied any means to defend themselves, you can lie to yourself and
pretend you are God. But it's odd how corrupt fucks like you mainly
express your illusory superiority through violence against the
defenseless. Very much like child molesters, eh?

Quite a sizeable sick little "society" has accreted around values such
as those, and it's no surprise that your naive brainwashed progeny are
so thoughtless and quick to do so much of your dirty work. By the
time they realize it is all a sham (if they ever do) they are bound to
your little "society" by their criminal guilt. But as they can always
project their shame, weakness, and guilt to an external target, it all
works out.

Too bad all of Western society must pay the costs of your weakness and
immorality. And there too, doesn't that remind you a bit of the way
much of the world had to pay for the excesses of the Germans during
World War II? And look how well that worked out for the Germans of
that time. Are they not admired for their success?



Regards,

Uncle Steve
--
Let me guess. The voices in _your_ head tell you that you're
special/intelligent/chosen/whatever which makes the quality of _your_
delusions so much better than those reported by your garden-variety
mental patient.
Chom Noamsky
2014-07-23 00:57:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by M.I.Wakefield
On 2014-07-22 02:09:59 +0000, (ಠ_ಠ)РаиÑ?а
Snip!
But let's start out from accurate information.
Karen will need directions to there.
Who's "Karen"? Your fictitious nemesis? I'll bet you had fictitious
friends when you were a kid.
No one else would play with you.
You are "Karen", Karen.
Happy to straighten that out for you.
How? By informing everyone that you're a pathological liar and a
bigot besides?
How does anything I've ever said suggest I'm either of those?
Why should I explain my reasoning to you when you would never do the
same (unless you were somehow compelled by an authority you could not
otherwise avoid)?
Ducking?
I understand.
Writing why you won't explain is a lot easier than writing an explanation...
...when you don't really have one.
No, I'm explaining the concept of reciprocity. You imagine I am
obligated to concede to you when all you do is take take take and
provide nothing in return except lies and insults.
What you're about is harassing certain individuals past the point of
tolerance, and no uncivlized amoral dirty trick is too illegal, too
immoral, or to extreme for your tastes. You "win" when you've
provoked something actionable, but of course nothing of your behaviour
or actions will be allowed to be considered when that happens. No
different from a corrupt pig who commits unprovoked violence against a
citizen and who then arrests that citizen if he dares to defend
himself.
Just another uncivlized piece of lying filth in the company of more
uncivilized filth infesting these newsgroups. But oh, no, it's all in
my imagination and you could never be the corrupt, malicious fuck you
are in reality.
Now, would you call that a rant or a rave?
Holy doodle, somebody needs a Prozac.
There's your holy narrative. What do you do when events and facts
interfere with your narrative? You lie, distort, and ignore relevant
evidence. After all, why should reality or mere facts interfere with
your political "needs"? Especially when it is so lucrative to loot
from civilians and so satisfying to prove your inherent superiority by
proving you are exempt from mortal constraints such as the law.
Laws are for little people; ain't that so Mr. chompchompchomp?
Laws aren't always moral and ethical... so you're a legal positivist are ya!
You'll never admit to what I actually hold to be true. It is much
more important for you to impose your "narrative" and the "facts" that
"support" it.
But you can have this one for free: some laws are necessary for
civilization to succeed, particularly where corrupt filth like you are
to be found. You like to pretend that you can be civilized and live
in a civlized society where you and yours are free from the
constraints of civilization. You can't have it both ways, but then if
you loot and destroy the lives of mere mortals in your lawless fashion
it does not affect your enjoyment of the amenities of civilization,
now does it?
You'll never be immortal or all knowing, but if you conscientiously
ignore those two key facts and only abuse and attack those who are
denied any means to defend themselves, you can lie to yourself and
pretend you are God. But it's odd how corrupt fucks like you mainly
express your illusory superiority through violence against the
defenseless. Very much like child molesters, eh?
Quite a sizeable sick little "society" has accreted around values such
as those, and it's no surprise that your naive brainwashed progeny are
so thoughtless and quick to do so much of your dirty work. By the
time they realize it is all a sham (if they ever do) they are bound to
your little "society" by their criminal guilt. But as they can always
project their shame, weakness, and guilt to an external target, it all
works out.
Too bad all of Western society must pay the costs of your weakness and
immorality. And there too, doesn't that remind you a bit of the way
much of the world had to pay for the excesses of the Germans during
World War II? And look how well that worked out for the Germans of
that time. Are they not admired for their success?
You appear to have, um, issues. Do you think this is the best place to
look for therapy?
(ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
2014-07-23 01:07:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by M.I.Wakefield
On 2014-07-22 02:09:59 +0000, (ಠ_ಠ)РаиÑ?а
Snip!
But let's start out from accurate information.
Karen will need directions to there.
Who's "Karen"? Your fictitious nemesis? I'll bet you had fictitious
friends when you were a kid.
No one else would play with you.
You are "Karen", Karen.
Happy to straighten that out for you.
How? By informing everyone that you're a pathological liar and a
bigot besides?
How does anything I've ever said suggest I'm either of those?
Why should I explain my reasoning to you when you would never do the
same (unless you were somehow compelled by an authority you could not
otherwise avoid)?
Ducking?
I understand.
Writing why you won't explain is a lot easier than writing an explanation...
...when you don't really have one.
No, I'm explaining the concept of reciprocity. You imagine I am
obligated to concede to you when all you do is take take take and
provide nothing in return except lies and insults.
What you're about is harassing certain individuals past the point of
tolerance, and no uncivlized amoral dirty trick is too illegal, too
immoral, or to extreme for your tastes. You "win" when you've
provoked something actionable, but of course nothing of your behaviour
or actions will be allowed to be considered when that happens. No
different from a corrupt pig who commits unprovoked violence against a
citizen and who then arrests that citizen if he dares to defend
himself.
Just another uncivlized piece of lying filth in the company of more
uncivilized filth infesting these newsgroups. But oh, no, it's all in
my imagination and you could never be the corrupt, malicious fuck you
are in reality.
Now, would you call that a rant or a rave?
Holy doodle, somebody needs a Prozac.
There's your holy narrative. What do you do when events and facts
interfere with your narrative? You lie, distort, and ignore relevant
evidence. After all, why should reality or mere facts interfere with
your political "needs"? Especially when it is so lucrative to loot
from civilians and so satisfying to prove your inherent superiority by
proving you are exempt from mortal constraints such as the law.
Laws are for little people; ain't that so Mr. chompchompchomp?
Laws aren't always moral and ethical... so you're a legal positivist are ya!
You'll never admit to what I actually hold to be true. It is much
more important for you to impose your "narrative" and the "facts" that
"support" it.
But you can have this one for free: some laws are necessary for
civilization to succeed, particularly where corrupt filth like you are
to be found. You like to pretend that you can be civilized and live
in a civlized society where you and yours are free from the
constraints of civilization. You can't have it both ways, but then if
you loot and destroy the lives of mere mortals in your lawless fashion
it does not affect your enjoyment of the amenities of civilization,
now does it?
You'll never be immortal or all knowing, but if you conscientiously
ignore those two key facts and only abuse and attack those who are
denied any means to defend themselves, you can lie to yourself and
pretend you are God. But it's odd how corrupt fucks like you mainly
express your illusory superiority through violence against the
defenseless. Very much like child molesters, eh?
Quite a sizeable sick little "society" has accreted around values such
as those, and it's no surprise that your naive brainwashed progeny are
so thoughtless and quick to do so much of your dirty work. By the
time they realize it is all a sham (if they ever do) they are bound to
your little "society" by their criminal guilt. But as they can always
project their shame, weakness, and guilt to an external target, it all
works out.
Too bad all of Western society must pay the costs of your weakness and
immorality. And there too, doesn't that remind you a bit of the way
much of the world had to pay for the excesses of the Germans during
World War II? And look how well that worked out for the Germans of
that time. Are they not admired for their success?
You appear to have, um, issues. Do you think this is the best place to
look for therapy?
Not as long as you're here, Dobranski. . . . . very toxic environment.
Uncle Steve
2014-07-23 01:28:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by M.I.Wakefield
On 2014-07-22 02:09:59 +0000, (�� _�� )� аи�?а
Snip!
But let's start out from accurate information.
Karen will need directions to there.
Who's "Karen"? Your fictitious nemesis? I'll bet you had fictitious
friends when you were a kid.
No one else would play with you.
You are "Karen", Karen.
Happy to straighten that out for you.
How? By informing everyone that you're a pathological liar and a
bigot besides?
How does anything I've ever said suggest I'm either of those?
Why should I explain my reasoning to you when you would never do the
same (unless you were somehow compelled by an authority you could not
otherwise avoid)?
Ducking?
I understand.
Writing why you won't explain is a lot easier than writing an explanation...
...when you don't really have one.
No, I'm explaining the concept of reciprocity. You imagine I am
obligated to concede to you when all you do is take take take and
provide nothing in return except lies and insults.
What you're about is harassing certain individuals past the point of
tolerance, and no uncivlized amoral dirty trick is too illegal, too
immoral, or to extreme for your tastes. You "win" when you've
provoked something actionable, but of course nothing of your behaviour
or actions will be allowed to be considered when that happens. No
different from a corrupt pig who commits unprovoked violence against a
citizen and who then arrests that citizen if he dares to defend
himself.
Just another uncivlized piece of lying filth in the company of more
uncivilized filth infesting these newsgroups. But oh, no, it's all in
my imagination and you could never be the corrupt, malicious fuck you
are in reality.
Now, would you call that a rant or a rave?
Holy doodle, somebody needs a Prozac.
There's your holy narrative. What do you do when events and facts
interfere with your narrative? You lie, distort, and ignore relevant
evidence. After all, why should reality or mere facts interfere with
your political "needs"? Especially when it is so lucrative to loot
from civilians and so satisfying to prove your inherent superiority by
proving you are exempt from mortal constraints such as the law.
Laws are for little people; ain't that so Mr. chompchompchomp?
Laws aren't always moral and ethical... so you're a legal positivist are ya!
You'll never admit to what I actually hold to be true. It is much
more important for you to impose your "narrative" and the "facts" that
"support" it.
But you can have this one for free: some laws are necessary for
civilization to succeed, particularly where corrupt filth like you are
to be found. You like to pretend that you can be civilized and live
in a civlized society where you and yours are free from the
constraints of civilization. You can't have it both ways, but then if
you loot and destroy the lives of mere mortals in your lawless fashion
it does not affect your enjoyment of the amenities of civilization,
now does it?
You'll never be immortal or all knowing, but if you conscientiously
ignore those two key facts and only abuse and attack those who are
denied any means to defend themselves, you can lie to yourself and
pretend you are God. But it's odd how corrupt fucks like you mainly
express your illusory superiority through violence against the
defenseless. Very much like child molesters, eh?
Quite a sizeable sick little "society" has accreted around values such
as those, and it's no surprise that your naive brainwashed progeny are
so thoughtless and quick to do so much of your dirty work. By the
time they realize it is all a sham (if they ever do) they are bound to
your little "society" by their criminal guilt. But as they can always
project their shame, weakness, and guilt to an external target, it all
works out.
Too bad all of Western society must pay the costs of your weakness and
immorality. And there too, doesn't that remind you a bit of the way
much of the world had to pay for the excesses of the Germans during
World War II? And look how well that worked out for the Germans of
that time. Are they not admired for their success?
You appear to have, um, issues. Do you think this is the best place to
look for therapy?
Yes, it is obviously my fault that you are a corrupt police-state
bitch with the morals of a serial killer.


Regards,

Uncle Steve
--
Let me guess. The voices in _your_ head tell you that you're
special/intelligent/chosen/whatever which makes the quality of _your_
delusions so much better than those reported by your garden-variety
mental patient.
Chom Noamsky
2014-07-23 01:34:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by M.I.Wakefield
On 2014-07-22 02:09:59 +0000, (ಠ_ಠ)РаиÑ?а
Snip!
But let's start out from accurate information.
Karen will need directions to there.
Who's "Karen"? Your fictitious nemesis? I'll bet you had
fictitious
friends when you were a kid.
No one else would play with you.
You are "Karen", Karen.
Happy to straighten that out for you.
How? By informing everyone that you're a pathological liar and a
bigot besides?
How does anything I've ever said suggest I'm either of those?
Why should I explain my reasoning to you when you would never do the
same (unless you were somehow compelled by an authority you could not
otherwise avoid)?
Ducking?
I understand.
Writing why you won't explain is a lot easier than writing an explanation...
...when you don't really have one.
No, I'm explaining the concept of reciprocity. You imagine I am
obligated to concede to you when all you do is take take take and
provide nothing in return except lies and insults.
What you're about is harassing certain individuals past the point of
tolerance, and no uncivlized amoral dirty trick is too illegal, too
immoral, or to extreme for your tastes. You "win" when you've
provoked something actionable, but of course nothing of your behaviour
or actions will be allowed to be considered when that happens. No
different from a corrupt pig who commits unprovoked violence against a
citizen and who then arrests that citizen if he dares to defend
himself.
Just another uncivlized piece of lying filth in the company of more
uncivilized filth infesting these newsgroups. But oh, no, it's all in
my imagination and you could never be the corrupt, malicious fuck you
are in reality.
Now, would you call that a rant or a rave?
Holy doodle, somebody needs a Prozac.
There's your holy narrative. What do you do when events and facts
interfere with your narrative? You lie, distort, and ignore relevant
evidence. After all, why should reality or mere facts interfere with
your political "needs"? Especially when it is so lucrative to loot
from civilians and so satisfying to prove your inherent superiority by
proving you are exempt from mortal constraints such as the law.
Laws are for little people; ain't that so Mr. chompchompchomp?
Laws aren't always moral and ethical... so you're a legal positivist are ya!
You'll never admit to what I actually hold to be true. It is much
more important for you to impose your "narrative" and the "facts" that
"support" it.
But you can have this one for free: some laws are necessary for
civilization to succeed, particularly where corrupt filth like you are
to be found. You like to pretend that you can be civilized and live
in a civlized society where you and yours are free from the
constraints of civilization. You can't have it both ways, but then if
you loot and destroy the lives of mere mortals in your lawless fashion
it does not affect your enjoyment of the amenities of civilization,
now does it?
You'll never be immortal or all knowing, but if you conscientiously
ignore those two key facts and only abuse and attack those who are
denied any means to defend themselves, you can lie to yourself and
pretend you are God. But it's odd how corrupt fucks like you mainly
express your illusory superiority through violence against the
defenseless. Very much like child molesters, eh?
Quite a sizeable sick little "society" has accreted around values such
as those, and it's no surprise that your naive brainwashed progeny are
so thoughtless and quick to do so much of your dirty work. By the
time they realize it is all a sham (if they ever do) they are bound to
your little "society" by their criminal guilt. But as they can always
project their shame, weakness, and guilt to an external target, it all
works out.
Too bad all of Western society must pay the costs of your weakness and
immorality. And there too, doesn't that remind you a bit of the way
much of the world had to pay for the excesses of the Germans during
World War II? And look how well that worked out for the Germans of
that time. Are they not admired for their success?
You appear to have, um, issues. Do you think this is the best place to
look for therapy?
Yes, it is obviously my fault that you are a corrupt police-state
bitch with the morals of a serial killer.
Wow, this newsgroup has degraded even worse than I thought.
(ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
2014-07-23 02:06:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
Wow, this newsgroup has degraded even worse than I thought.
That's because you're posting to it again, Dobranski.
You're like an enemy target - attracting scud missiles.
(ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
2014-07-23 01:04:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
Now, would you call that a rant or a rave?
Holy doodle, somebody needs a Prozac.
Give him some of yours, Dobranski. You're such a selfish prick.
Alan Baker
2014-07-23 03:59:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Alan Baker
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by M.I.Wakefield
On 2014-07-22 02:09:59 +0000, (ಠ_ಠ)Раиса
Snip!
But let's start out from accurate information.
Karen will need directions to there.
Who's "Karen"? Your fictitious nemesis? I'll bet you had fictitious
friends when you were a kid.
No one else would play with you.
You are "Karen", Karen.
Happy to straighten that out for you.
How? By informing everyone that you're a pathological liar and a
bigot besides?
How does anything I've ever said suggest I'm either of those?
Why should I explain my reasoning to you when you would never do the
same (unless you were somehow compelled by an authority you could not
otherwise avoid)?
Ducking?
I understand.
Writing why you won't explain is a lot easier than writing an explanation...
...when you don't really have one.
No, I'm explaining the concept of reciprocity. You imagine I am
obligated to concede to you when all you do is take take take and
provide nothing in return except lies and insults.
I imagine no such thing.

And I never lie and rarely insult.
Post by Uncle Steve
What you're about is harassing certain individuals past the point of
tolerance, and no uncivlized amoral dirty trick is too illegal, too
immoral, or to extreme for your tastes. You "win" when you've
provoked something actionable, but of course nothing of your behaviour
or actions will be allowed to be considered when that happens. No
different from a corrupt pig who commits unprovoked violence against a
citizen and who then arrests that citizen if he dares to defend
himself.
What is this "harassment" you claim: that I reply to posts in a public forum?
Post by Uncle Steve
Just another uncivlized piece of lying filth in the company of more
uncivilized filth infesting these newsgroups. But oh, no, it's all in
my imagination and you could never be the corrupt, malicious fuck you
are in reality.
It is all in your imagination.
Dave Smith
2014-07-22 20:22:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Karen will need directions to there.
Who's "Karen"? Your fictitious nemesis? I'll bet you had fictitious
friends when you were a kid.
No one else would play with you.
You are "Karen", Karen.
Happy to straighten that out for you.
It is interesting that it is only KKKaren's newest username aliases who
ask who Karen is and try to pretend it is not her. Maybe we should be
embarrassed that she thinks we are stupid enough that she might actually
fool us with more lies and stupidity.
(ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
2014-07-22 21:22:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dave Smith
It is interesting that it is only KKKaren's newest username aliases who
ask who Karen is and try to pretend it is not her. Maybe we should be
embarrassed that she thinks we are stupid enough that she might actually
fool us with more lies and stupidity.
Just can't get "KKKaren" out of your mind, eh, 'Smith'?
She must have stuck that barb pretty far under your foreskin.
Chom Noamsky
2014-07-22 22:17:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dave Smith
Post by Alan Baker
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by M.I.Wakefield
Karen will need directions to there.
Who's "Karen"? Your fictitious nemesis? I'll bet you had fictitious
friends when you were a kid.
No one else would play with you.
You are "Karen", Karen.
Happy to straighten that out for you.
It is interesting that it is only KKKaren's newest username aliases who
ask who Karen is and try to pretend it is not her. Maybe we should be
embarrassed that she thinks we are stupid enough that she might actually
fool us with more lies and stupidity.
If you were Karen, wouldn't you constantly be trying to get away from
yourself too?
(ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
2014-07-23 01:11:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
If you were Karen, wouldn't you constantly be trying to get away from
yourself too?
Do you see me 'trying to get away from' being Karen Gordon? It's a good
cover for the real me.
Use it all you like. Even contact all the Karen Gordons you find
through phone books or google.
But I caution you to be polite - because you're looking up people who
don't even share my name.
My real name. And that could land you in trouble with them, their
employers, or even the police.
Take my advice on that. Eh, Schild?
Chom Noamsky
2014-07-23 01:30:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by Chom Noamsky
If you were Karen, wouldn't you constantly be trying to get away from
yourself too?
Do you see me 'trying to get away from' being Karen Gordon? It's a good
cover for the real me.
Use it all you like. Even contact all the Karen Gordons you find
through phone books or google.
But I caution you to be polite - because you're looking up people who
don't even share my name.
My real name. And that could land you in trouble with them, their
employers, or even the police.
Take my advice on that. Eh, Schild?
Wow, you've deluded yourself into believing someone actually cares who
you are. I certainly don't, so I'll just leave the identity persecution
up to you. You're just a troll, Karen, a messed-up, psychotic little troll.
(ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
2014-07-23 01:37:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
Wow, you've deluded yourself into believing someone actually cares who
you are. I certainly don't, so I'll just leave the identity persecution
up to you. You're just a troll, Karen, a messed-up, psychotic little troll.
Oh, you care alright, Dobranski. Big time.
Your postings on alt.global-warming are as much about my identity as
they are about global warming.

I know who you are. You don't know who I am.
That is not a comfortable situation for someone like a Kim Dobranski.
Chom Noamsky
2014-07-23 01:45:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by Chom Noamsky
Wow, you've deluded yourself into believing someone actually cares who
you are. I certainly don't, so I'll just leave the identity persecution
up to you. You're just a troll, Karen, a messed-up, psychotic little troll.
Oh, you care alright, Dobranski. Big time.
Your postings on alt.global-warming are as much about my identity as
they are about global warming.
I know who you are. You don't know who I am.
That is not a comfortable situation for someone like a Kim Dobranski.
That's nice, Karen. Stop by for coffee anytime!
(ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
2014-07-23 02:09:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by Chom Noamsky
Wow, you've deluded yourself into believing someone actually cares who
you are. I certainly don't, so I'll just leave the identity persecution
up to you. You're just a troll, Karen, a messed-up, psychotic little troll.
Oh, you care alright, Dobranski. Big time.
Your postings on alt.global-warming are as much about my identity as
they are about global warming.
I know who you are. You don't know who I am.
That is not a comfortable situation for someone like a Kim Dobranski.
That's nice, Karen. Stop by for coffee anytime!
You MUST be joking . . . . (>_<)
I'm not partial to spending visits with borderline psychopaths.
Chom Noamsky
2014-07-23 02:14:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by Chom Noamsky
Wow, you've deluded yourself into believing someone actually cares who
you are. I certainly don't, so I'll just leave the identity persecution
up to you. You're just a troll, Karen, a messed-up, psychotic little troll.
Oh, you care alright, Dobranski. Big time.
Your postings on alt.global-warming are as much about my identity as
they are about global warming.
I know who you are. You don't know who I am.
That is not a comfortable situation for someone like a Kim Dobranski.
That's nice, Karen. Stop by for coffee anytime!
You MUST be joking . . . . (>_<)
I'm not partial to spending visits with borderline psychopaths.
So why are you stalking this person and harassing his virtual person
everywhere he goes on Usenet? Do you see how insane you are yet?
(ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
2014-07-23 02:19:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by Chom Noamsky
Wow, you've deluded yourself into believing someone actually cares who
you are. I certainly don't, so I'll just leave the identity persecution
up to you. You're just a troll, Karen, a messed-up, psychotic little troll.
Oh, you care alright, Dobranski. Big time.
Your postings on alt.global-warming are as much about my identity as
they are about global warming.
I know who you are. You don't know who I am.
That is not a comfortable situation for someone like a Kim Dobranski.
That's nice, Karen. Stop by for coffee anytime!
You MUST be joking . . . . (>_<)
I'm not partial to spending visits with borderline psychopaths.
So why are you stalking this person and harassing his virtual person
everywhere he goes on Usenet? Do you see how insane you are yet?
What's it to you? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Chom Noamsky
2014-07-23 02:22:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by Chom Noamsky
Wow, you've deluded yourself into believing someone actually cares who
you are. I certainly don't, so I'll just leave the identity persecution
up to you. You're just a troll, Karen, a messed-up, psychotic little troll.
Oh, you care alright, Dobranski. Big time.
Your postings on alt.global-warming are as much about my identity as
they are about global warming.
I know who you are. You don't know who I am.
That is not a comfortable situation for someone like a Kim Dobranski.
That's nice, Karen. Stop by for coffee anytime!
You MUST be joking . . . . (>_<)
I'm not partial to spending visits with borderline psychopaths.
So why are you stalking this person and harassing his virtual person
everywhere he goes on Usenet? Do you see how insane you are yet?
What's it to you? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Well, at least you didn't deny being psychotic and insane. You obsess
over this person endlessly, yet you don't want to even stop by for
coffee. Just doesn't make sense (see first paragraph).
(ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
2014-07-23 23:57:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by Chom Noamsky
So why are you stalking this person and harassing his virtual person
everywhere he goes on Usenet? Do you see how insane you are yet?
What's it to you? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Well, at least you didn't deny being psychotic and insane. You obsess
over this person endlessly, yet you don't want to even stop by for
coffee. Just doesn't make sense (see first paragraph).
What's it to you? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Uncle Steve
2014-07-23 02:27:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by Chom Noamsky
Wow, you've deluded yourself into believing someone actually cares who
you are. I certainly don't, so I'll just leave the identity persecution
up to you. You're just a troll, Karen, a messed-up, psychotic little troll.
Oh, you care alright, Dobranski. Big time.
Your postings on alt.global-warming are as much about my identity as
they are about global warming.
I know who you are. You don't know who I am.
That is not a comfortable situation for someone like a Kim Dobranski.
That's nice, Karen. Stop by for coffee anytime!
You MUST be joking . . . . (>_<)
I'm not partial to spending visits with borderline psychopaths.
So why are you stalking this person and harassing his virtual person
everywhere he goes on Usenet? Do you see how insane you are yet?
So you're here to make other people recognize how insane they are?
Exactly what do you do in service of that noble objective?

Distort fact and circumstance in the didactic mode?

Lie cheat and steal to acquire their attention when it is not directed
your way?

Employ useful idiots to regurgitate carefully constructed texts
intended to engineer particular conceputal associations?

How about diabetic shock? Ever used that method to "shake someone out
of a cognitive rut that you have identified as unproductive"?

Please, do tell us how you employ science (and psychology) in this
noblest of noble causes, dumbfuck.



Regards,

Uncle Steve
--
Let me guess. The voices in _your_ head tell you that you're
special/intelligent/chosen/whatever which makes the quality of _your_
delusions so much better than those reported by your garden-variety
mental patient.
Chom Noamsky
2014-07-23 02:30:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Uncle Steve
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
Post by Chom Noamsky
Wow, you've deluded yourself into believing someone actually cares who
you are. I certainly don't, so I'll just leave the identity persecution
up to you. You're just a troll, Karen, a messed-up, psychotic little troll.
Oh, you care alright, Dobranski. Big time.
Your postings on alt.global-warming are as much about my identity as
they are about global warming.
I know who you are. You don't know who I am.
That is not a comfortable situation for someone like a Kim Dobranski.
That's nice, Karen. Stop by for coffee anytime!
You MUST be joking . . . . (>_<)
I'm not partial to spending visits with borderline psychopaths.
So why are you stalking this person and harassing his virtual person
everywhere he goes on Usenet? Do you see how insane you are yet?
So you're here to make other people recognize how insane they are?
Exactly what do you do in service of that noble objective?
Distort fact and circumstance in the didactic mode?
Lie cheat and steal to acquire their attention when it is not directed
your way?
Employ useful idiots to regurgitate carefully constructed texts
intended to engineer particular conceputal associations?
How about diabetic shock? Ever used that method to "shake someone out
of a cognitive rut that you have identified as unproductive"?
Please, do tell us how you employ science (and psychology) in this
noblest of noble causes, dumbfuck.
My gods, the inmates have taken over the asylum!
(ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
2014-07-23 23:59:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
Post by Uncle Steve
So you're here to make other people recognize how insane they are?
Exactly what do you do in service of that noble objective?
Distort fact and circumstance in the didactic mode?
Lie cheat and steal to acquire their attention when it is not directed
your way?
Employ useful idiots to regurgitate carefully constructed texts
intended to engineer particular conceputal associations?
How about diabetic shock? Ever used that method to "shake someone out
of a cognitive rut that you have identified as unproductive"?
Please, do tell us how you employ science (and psychology) in this
noblest of noble causes, dumbfuck.
My gods, the inmates have taken over the asylum!
Is that where you're posting from? Everything is starting to make sense
all of a sudden . . . .

Greg Carr
2014-07-23 01:47:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
If you were Karen, wouldn't you constantly be trying to get away from
yourself too?
Do you see me 'trying to get away from' being Karen Gordon? It's a good
cover for the real me.
Use it all you like. Even contact all the Karen Gordons you find through
phone books or google.
But I caution you to be polite - because you're looking up people who
don't even share my name.
My real name. And that could land you in trouble with them, their
employers, or even the police.
Take my advice on that. Eh, Schild?
The "real" Karen Gordon is a CBC personality of the past. Just like KKK
a fan of the CBC.
--
*Read and obey the Bible*
(ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
2014-07-23 01:12:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chom Noamsky
If you were Karen, wouldn't you constantly be trying to get away from
yourself too?
If you were Kim Dobranski, wouldn't you be in a constant state of denial
and attack?
(ಠ_ಠ)РаОса
2014-07-22 19:28:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Wow - you are so ill-informed it's frightening to think that you might
be responsible for anyone's wellbeing.
"Darling, don't be petty. It's the first instinct of the weak.”
Post by Alan Baker
While they may not be prescription medications, they're not "very
inexpensive". An epenephrine injector costs about $100 and they expire
in less than 2 years.
Can't afford $100, Baker? No medical coverage? So sorry . . .
Post by Alan Baker
Is it still a good idea to have one if you can get one? Sure.
But let's start out from accurate information.
Let's not rely on you then, barking Baker . . . you're just here to be
nasty to a particular female poster.

misogyny: [mi-soj-uh-nee, mahy-]
noun
1. hatred, dislike, or mistrust of women.
Alan Baker
2014-07-22 19:33:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alan Baker
Wow - you are so ill-informed it's frightening to think that you might
be responsible for anyone's wellbeing.
"Darling, don't be petty. It's the first instinct of the weak.”
Post by Alan Baker
While they may not be prescription medications, they're not "very
inexpensive". An epenephrine injector costs about $100 and they expire
in less than 2 years.
Can't afford $100, Baker? No medical coverage? So sorry . . .
It's not a matter of "afford", Karen.

$100 is not "very inexpensive".
Post by Alan Baker
Is it still a good idea to have one if you can get one? Sure.
But let's start out from accurate information.
Let's not rely on you then, barking Baker . . . you're just here to be
nasty to a particular female poster.
misogyny: [mi-soj-uh-nee, mahy-]
noun
1. hatred, dislike, or mistrust of women.
LOL
Loading...