Discussion:
Major train derailment and fire - Sask.
(too old to reply)
(ಠ_ಠ)
2014-10-07 22:45:32 UTC
Permalink
CBC News Posted: Oct 07, 2014


Major train derailment and fire near Wadena, Sask.

Officials worried about toxic smoke from burning railcars



A major train derailment has occurred near Wadena, Sask., prompting authorities
to keep people well back from burning railcars and huge plumes of smoke that
may be toxic.​

The CN Rail derailment happened at 10:40 a.m. CST Tuesday about 20 kilometres
west of the town of 1,300, which is about 230 kilometres east of Saskatoon.

Officials are worried about toxic smoke from the burning cars and are keeping
people eight kilometres from the scene.

"It's huge," Alison Squires, editor of the Wadena News, told CBC News. "It's
like taller than a [grain] elevator."

About 50 people were evacuated from Clair, about one kilometre from the crash.
People were also evacuated from other farm homes in the area, the RCMP said.

Students at the school in Wadena are being kept indoors.

"Huge plumes of smoke and fire," Squires said. "RCMP and obviously local fire
departments are there. They're detouring traffic."

A spokesman for CN said the train was hauling 100 cars, 26 of which derailed.

Six of them contained hazardous materials, including four that had either
hydrochloric acid or caustic soda.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The other two had petroleum distillates, CN said.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Heavy smoke and fire were seen coming out of the crashed cars.

According to Squires, traffic detours extend to routes that may be downwind of
the derailment.

"They're detouring traffic north of Highway 5, versus south, because they're
expecting that the smoke is toxic."

It's not clear which cars are burning, she added.
One of the cars not directly in the fire appeared to be carrying anhydrous
ammonia, a toxic material used to make fertilizer, she said.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It appears there were also some grain cars and oil cars involved, Squires said.

A CN hazardous materials team was seen en route to the site, around 2 p.m.

There were no reported injuries. CN said two employees were on the train at the
time of the derailment and both are safe.

Officials from the Transportation Safety Board of Canada were on their way to
the site.
___________________________________________

Five photos here:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/major-train-derailment-and-fire-near-wadena-sask-1.2791337
Alan Baker
2014-10-07 23:31:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)
CBC News Posted: Oct 07, 2014
Major train derailment and fire near Wadena, Sask.
Officials worried about toxic smoke from burning railcars
A major train derailment has occurred near Wadena, Sask., prompting
authorities to keep people well back from burning railcars and huge
plumes of smoke that may be toxic.​
The CN Rail derailment happened at 10:40 a.m. CST Tuesday about 20
kilometres west of the town of 1,300, which is about 230 kilometres
east of Saskatoon.
Officials are worried about toxic smoke from the burning cars and are
keeping people eight kilometres from the scene.
"It's huge," Alison Squires, editor of the Wadena News, told CBC News.
"It's like taller than a [grain] elevator."
About 50 people were evacuated from Clair, about one kilometre from the
crash. People were also evacuated from other farm homes in the area,
the RCMP said.
Students at the school in Wadena are being kept indoors.
"Huge plumes of smoke and fire," Squires said. "RCMP and obviously
local fire departments are there. They're detouring traffic."
A spokesman for CN said the train was hauling 100 cars, 26 of which derailed.
Six of them contained hazardous materials, including four that had
either hydrochloric acid or caustic soda.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The other two had petroleum distillates, CN said.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Heavy smoke and fire were seen coming out of the crashed cars.
According to Squires, traffic detours extend to routes that may be
downwind of the derailment.
"They're detouring traffic north of Highway 5, versus south, because
they're expecting that the smoke is toxic."
It's not clear which cars are burning, she added.
One of the cars not directly in the fire appeared to be carrying
anhydrous ammonia, a toxic material used to make fertilizer, she said.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It appears there were also some grain cars and oil cars involved, Squires said.
A CN hazardous materials team was seen en route to the site, around 2 p.m.
There were no reported injuries. CN said two employees were on the
train at the time of the derailment and both are safe.
Officials from the Transportation Safety Board of Canada were on their
way to the site.
___________________________________________
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/major-train-derailment-and-fire-near-wadena-sask-1.2791337
OK.

So?

Are you proposing that we all go back to the horse and buggy?
(ಠ_ಠ)
2014-10-09 21:43:16 UTC
Permalink
No "we all". She proposes that you and me go back to the horse and buggy, not
her, to be exact.
You don't read her posts. You've instructed others to ignore her. Why can't
YOU take your own advice, simpleton?
I do not recall her saying "I believe this is wrong, so I am leading by example
by denying it to myself" in any of her enviro rants. Just a typical leftie
stand: cut anybody but me.
Sounds like you feel left out.
PS. Original cross-post to 5 (yes, FIVE) irrelevant newsgroups removed.
So train derailments and explosions aren't of interest to other provinces in
Canada when they happen?
Is that why every paper across this country reported on Lac Megantic and this
latest train wreck and fire?
Your opinion is worth nothing, simpleton. Grasp that fact and move on . . . .
Alan Baker
2014-10-09 22:54:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)
No "we all". She proposes that you and me go back to the horse and buggy, not
her, to be exact.
You don't read her posts. You've instructed others to ignore her. Why
can't YOU take your own advice, simpleton?
I do not recall her saying "I believe this is wrong, so I am leading by example
by denying it to myself" in any of her enviro rants. Just a typical leftie
stand: cut anybody but me.
Sounds like you feel left out.
PS. Original cross-post to 5 (yes, FIVE) irrelevant newsgroups removed.
So train derailments and explosions aren't of interest to other
provinces in Canada when they happen?
Is that why every paper across this country reported on Lac Megantic
and this latest train wreck and fire?
Your opinion is worth nothing, simpleton. Grasp that fact and move on . . . .
Lots of things are "of interest", Karen...

...but you seem to present only a narrow slice of them that fits with
your ideological agenda.

Loading...