Discussion:
Fracking for oil - and the 'oops again' syndrome
(too old to reply)
(ಠ_ಠ)
2014-12-22 22:00:29 UTC
Permalink
The Canadian Press - Published Saturday, Dec. 20 2014

Oil sands leak that contaminated aquifer renews technology questions



EDMONTON —
A Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. oilsands operation that has contaminated a
groundwater aquifer is renewing questions about a technology that has already
been linked to another serious leak in northern Alberta.

Loading Image...

The Alberta Energy Regulator says CNRL reported a break in a well at its Wolf
Lake high pressure cyclic steam stimulation project in late October, and that
the company later discovered elevated levels of hydrocarbons in the aquifer
about 60 kilometres northwest of Cold Lake.

The area is located about 10 kilometres away from the company’s Primrose East
property where a bitumen-water mixture was found oozing to the surface last year.

CNRL was using the same steam method there as well.

“This is a problematic technology. There’s been problems dating back to 2009.
And I think Albertans really have to ask themselves, how many times does this
company get to say, ‘Oops, we did it again,’ before the government takes
proactive action to deal with this technology, which clearly is riskier than
this company claims?” Keith Stewart of Greenpeace Canada said in an interview
on Saturday.

High-pressure cyclic steam stimulation — often described as “huff and puff” —
is a process that alternates between injecting steam and drawing the softened
bitumen to the surface.

Earlier this year, the province’s energy watchdog suggested a link between the
process and old drill holes in the Primrose area, which it said may have
provided paths for fluids to flow to the surface.

CNRL promised to switch to a low-pressure process known as steam flooding when
it sought approval to resume crude extraction from Area 1 of its Primrose East
property. It was granted permission in September to resume work at the site.

Ryan Bartlett, a spokesman for the regulator, said Saturday that he didn’t know
whether drill holes may have played a role in the contamination at Wolf Lake.
“We’re still investigating what the cause is, so I wouldn’t want to speculate,”
Bartlett said, noting the high pressure system is used by other companies
elsewhere in Alberta.

CNRL spokeswoman Julie Woo said in a brief email statement that both the
Primrose and Wolf Lake projects used the same technology.

“Canadian Natural has detected elevated levels of hydrocarbons deep underground
in a new monitoring well. We will continue to work closely with the Alberta
Energy Regulator (AER) to monitor and manage the situation,” the email stated.

The regulator said the well at Wolf Lake has stopped operating and CNRL can’t
resume operations until it meets regulatory requirements.

Bartlett earlier said that public health and safety are not at risk and the
nearest private water wells are 15 kilometres away.

He said CNRL will be required to clean up the aquifer.

Stewart, however, said it could take months for the steam to cool and the
pressure to drop. He said that means any leaks from the well could continue
for months.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

He also expressed doubts that a cleanup is possible. . . .

“I don’t know how you get benzine out of an aquifer. There’s no process for
filtering it out. It’s basically a mix of carcinogenic chemicals into this
underground water system. It’s not like you can put in a scrubber and clean
it all up,” Stewart said.

“The only solution to this is prevention, to actually make sure the technology
being used it safe and not just taking the company’s word for it but actually
having a strong independent regulator who’s looking after the public’s interest
rather than issuing orders after the leak has happened.”

The investigation into what went wrong at Primrose is ongoing. Bartlett said a
full report is due in the first quarter of 2015.

Some 1.2 million litres of the bitumen-water emulsion have been recovered and
20.7 hectares have been affected. CNRL said over the summer that clean-up at
Primrose is complete.

Canadian Natural pipeline leaks 60,000 litres of crude: Alberta regulator
Alan Baker
2014-12-22 22:10:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)
The Canadian Press - Published Saturday, Dec. 20 2014
Oil sands leak that contaminated aquifer renews technology questions
Oil sands oil recovery isn't fracking, but you never let facts get in
the way of your rants, do you?
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)
EDMONTON —
A Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. oilsands operation that has
contaminated a groundwater aquifer is renewing questions about a
technology that has already been linked to another serious leak in
northern Alberta.
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/sites/vieques/images/gw_groundwater_waste.png
The Alberta Energy Regulator says CNRL reported a break in a well at
its Wolf Lake high pressure cyclic steam stimulation project in late
October, and that the company later discovered elevated levels of
hydrocarbons in the aquifer about 60 kilometres northwest of Cold Lake.
The area is located about 10 kilometres away from the company’s
Primrose East property where a bitumen-water mixture was found oozing
to the surface last year.
CNRL was using the same steam method there as well.
“This is a problematic technology. There’s been problems dating back
to 2009. And I think Albertans really have to ask themselves, how
many times does this company get to say, ‘Oops, we did it again,’
before the government takes proactive action to deal with this
technology, which clearly is riskier than this company claims?” Keith
Stewart of Greenpeace Canada said in an interview on Saturday.
High-pressure cyclic steam stimulation — often described as “huff and
puff” — is a process that alternates between injecting steam and
drawing the softened bitumen to the surface.
Earlier this year, the province’s energy watchdog suggested a link
between the process and old drill holes in the Primrose area, which it
said may have provided paths for fluids to flow to the surface.
CNRL promised to switch to a low-pressure process known as steam
flooding when it sought approval to resume crude extraction from Area 1
of its Primrose East property. It was granted permission in September
to resume work at the site.
Ryan Bartlett, a spokesman for the regulator, said Saturday that he
didn’t know whether drill holes may have played a role in the
contamination at Wolf Lake.
“We’re still investigating what the cause is, so I wouldn’t want to
speculate,” Bartlett said, noting the high pressure system is used by
other companies elsewhere in Alberta.
CNRL spokeswoman Julie Woo said in a brief email statement that both
the Primrose and Wolf Lake projects used the same technology.
“Canadian Natural has detected elevated levels of hydrocarbons deep
underground in a new monitoring well. We will continue to work closely
with the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) to monitor and manage the
situation,” the email stated.
The regulator said the well at Wolf Lake has stopped operating and CNRL
can’t resume operations until it meets regulatory requirements.
Bartlett earlier said that public health and safety are not at risk and
the nearest private water wells are 15 kilometres away.
He said CNRL will be required to clean up the aquifer.
Stewart, however, said it could take months for the steam to cool and
the pressure to drop. He said that means any leaks from the well could
continue for months.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
He also expressed doubts that a cleanup is possible. . . .
“I don’t know how you get benzine out of an aquifer. There’s no
process for filtering it out. It’s basically a mix of carcinogenic
chemicals into this underground water system. It’s not like you can
put in a scrubber and clean it all up,” Stewart said.
“The only solution to this is prevention, to actually make sure the
technology being used it safe and not just taking the company’s word
for it but actually having a strong independent regulator who’s looking
after the public’s interest rather than issuing orders after the leak
has happened.”
The investigation into what went wrong at Primrose is ongoing.
Bartlett said a full report is due in the first quarter of 2015.
Some 1.2 million litres of the bitumen-water emulsion have been
recovered and 20.7 hectares have been affected. CNRL said over the
summer that clean-up at Primrose is complete.
Canadian Natural pipeline leaks 60,000 litres of crude: Alberta regulator
(ಠ_ಠ)
2014-12-22 22:18:43 UTC
Permalink
Oil sands oil recovery isn't fracking, but you never let facts get in the way
of your rants, do you?
Loading Image...
Alan Baker
2014-12-22 22:22:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)
Oil sands oil recovery isn't fracking, but you never let facts get in the way
of your rants, do you?
http://cdnpix.com/show/imgs/fba2ca91d83d43fae360ec31bc894bcb.jpg
I'm sorry, but how does a mindless platitude actually address that
steam extraction of oil from oil sands isn't fracking?
(ಠ_ಠ)
2014-12-22 22:39:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)
Oil sands oil recovery isn't fracking, but you never let facts get in the way
of your rants, do you?
http://cdnpix.com/show/imgs/fba2ca91d83d43fae360ec31bc894bcb.jpg
I'm sorry, but how does a mindless platitude actually address that steam
extraction of oil from oil sands isn't fracking?
It's just another system that is making one helluva mess in the tarsands of Alberta.
And poisoning underground aquifers in the process.
Thanks for admitting that, Baker.
Alan Baker
2014-12-22 23:34:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)
Oil sands oil recovery isn't fracking, but you never let facts get in the way
of your rants, do you?
http://cdnpix.com/show/imgs/fba2ca91d83d43fae360ec31bc894bcb.jpg
I'm sorry, but how does a mindless platitude actually address that steam
extraction of oil from oil sands isn't fracking?
Correct. I said this.
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)
It's just another system that is making one helluva mess in the tarsands of Alberta.
And poisoning underground aquifers in the process.
This, I never said, hence you are a liar.
Post by (ಠ_ಠ)
Thanks for admitting that, Baker.
No, no... ...thank you.

Continue reading on narkive:
Search results for 'Fracking for oil - and the 'oops again' syndrome' (Questions and Answers)
333
replies
Yes or No. Is it OK with you having a liar for a president? ?
started 2020-09-28 15:04:02 UTC
politics
Loading...